APP PLATFORM COMPARISON

ironSource Exchange (iSX)
vs Moloco SDK

Which fits your app and monetization stack? Compare access, implementation and payment terms, then use the evidence below to plan your next step.

Catalog compiled 2026-11-03Editorial interpretation + linked sourcesComparison methodology ↗

THE PRACTICAL DIFFERENCES

What matters in this pair

Start with the job

ironSource Exchange (iSX) is listed as mobile ad exchange; Moloco SDK as mobile ad network. Different roles can complement each other. Confirm whether you are replacing a full stack or adding a demand partner.

Plan the application

Moloco SDK has the lower editorial setup-effort estimate (medium). That is a planning signal, not evidence of a higher approval rate or faster review.

Match the placements

Shared catalog formats: Banner, Interstitial, Rewarded video. Start with a comparable placement; similarly named formats can still differ in implementation and ad behavior.

Read popularity in context

Comparable adoption data is missing for ironSource Exchange (iSX). Missing coverage is not evidence of lower popularity; no winner is assigned from it.

On smaller screens, scroll each table horizontally to keep both platforms side by side.

01 / Fit & access

Setup effort and review profiles are editorial estimates based on catalog requirements. They are not approval rates.

ironSource Exchange (iSX) vs Moloco SDK — Fit & access
What to compareironSource Exchange (iSX)Moloco SDK
Platform roleMobile ad exchangeCatalog source ↗Mobile ad networkCatalog source ↗
Best suited toApp publishers confirming continued iSX programmatic demand and supported onboarding with Unity.Editorial assessmentApp developers adding Moloco publisher demand to a supported mediation stack.Editorial assessment
Setup effortHighEditorial estimate of review and integration effort; not a measured implementation time.MediumEditorial estimate of review and integration effort; not a measured implementation time.
Review profileAvailability confirmation neededConfirm current iSX access with Unity; legacy ironSource direct-demand onboarding no longer applies.Partner and app reviewPublisher portal access, app registration, bidding credentials and supported adapters are required.
Entry requirementsConfirm current publisher onboarding and integration availability with Unity. Maintain the supported ironSource Ads SDK and configure eligible app monetization instances and iSX supply settings. ironSource Ads direct demand ended on April 30, 2026; do not rely on obsolete direct-demand onboarding guides.Catalog source ↗Obtain access to the Moloco Publisher Portal, register your app and create ad units. Integrate the Moloco SDK and the adapter for your supported mediator, configure bidding credentials and privacy settings and test the integration. Confirm current onboarding availability with Moloco.Catalog source ↗
Approval probability / timeNo comparable verified benchmarkNo measured acceptance rate or guaranteed review time is available in this directory.No comparable verified benchmarkNo measured acceptance rate or guaranteed review time is available in this directory.
Regions & audienceConfirm iSX app inventory, onboarding and payment eligibilityCatalog source ↗Confirm publisher onboarding, app inventory and payment eligibilityCatalog source ↗
Google demand dependencyNot identified as Google-dependent in this catalogThe platform still has its own content, traffic and privacy policies.Not identified as Google-dependent in this catalogThe platform still has its own content, traffic and privacy policies.

02 / Formats & implementation

A mediation tool, a managed service and a demand source have different jobs. Compare the integration you will actually use.

ironSource Exchange (iSX) vs Moloco SDK — Formats & implementation
What to compareironSource Exchange (iSX)Moloco SDK
Ad formats & capabilities
BannerInterstitialRewarded video
Product source ↗
BannerInterstitialRewarded videoNative
Product source ↗
Integration contextUnity’s ironSource Exchange continues to supply programmatic in-app demand through the ironSource Ads SDK. It is separate from LevelPlay mediation and the former ironSource direct-demand business.Catalog source ↗Moloco’s in-app bidding SDK connects publisher apps to Moloco advertising demand through supported mediation partners. This is the publisher product, distinct from advertiser campaign buying.Catalog source ↗
What to check before switchingironSource direct demand ended April 30, 2026; iSX remains distinct from LevelPlay mediation.Editorial checklistThis comparison covers Moloco’s publisher SDK, not its advertiser campaigns or retail media products.Editorial checklist
Privacy & consent checksCheck SDK data collection, consent forwarding, app-ads.txt and applicable store / ATT requirements.Verify the chosen integration; inclusion here is not a privacy certification.Check SDK data collection, consent forwarding, app-ads.txt and applicable store / ATT requirements.Verify the chosen integration; inclusion here is not a privacy certification.

03 / Earnings & payments

Revenue potential is not a fixed platform score. Compare net results for the same audience, period, placement and format.

ironSource Exchange (iSX) vs Moloco SDK — Earnings & payments
What to compareironSource Exchange (iSX)Moloco SDK
Revenue potentialRequires a matched-inventory testCompare net ad ARPDAU, eCPM, fill, impressions per user and retention by OS / country / format.Requires a matched-inventory testCompare net ad ARPDAU, eCPM, fill, impressions per user and retention by OS / country / format.
Fees / revenue shareNo standardized verified fee comparisonAsk for the actual agreement: share denominator, demand fees, serving costs, adjustments and optional charges.No standardized verified fee comparisonAsk for the actual agreement: share denominator, demand fees, serving costs, adjustments and optional charges.
Minimum payoutConfirm current iSX publisher account terms with UnityCatalog source ↗Per publisher contract; no universal minimum verifiedCatalog source ↗
Payment methodsPer supported publisher country and payment accountCatalog source ↗Confirm supported payment methods during publisher onboardingCatalog source ↗
Payment schedulePer iSX publisher payment agreementCatalog source ↗Invoices generated monthly; payments follow your contract termsCatalog source ↗
Contracts & exitConfirm the applicable agreementCheck exclusivity, notice period, account ownership, clawbacks and payment of the final balance.Confirm the applicable agreementCheck exclusivity, notice period, account ownership, clawbacks and payment of the final balance.

04 / Adoption & public evidence

AppBrain snapshot: 2026-11-02. Percentage of Google Play Android apps containing the named SDK (Overall / Apps). Code detection does not prove active use. Excludes iOS and other app stores.

ironSource Exchange (iSX) vs Moloco SDK — Adoption & public evidence
What to compareironSource Exchange (iSX)Moloco SDK
Measured adoptionComparable data unavailableA product-specific comparable measure was not verified. The ironSource SDK measure used as a LevelPlay proxy is not duplicated for iSX.AppBrain ↗2.61% of Android appsMoloco SDK code detection, not an active publisher or advertiser count.Moloco ↗
Active publisher / user countComparable count not verifiedDetected sites or SDKs are not active publisher accounts, unique users or ad impressions.Comparable count not verifiedDetected sites or SDKs are not active publisher accounts, unique users or ad impressions.
Provider website trafficComparable monthly visits not verifiedProvider-domain visits measure interest in a company, not the reach of its ad inventory.Comparable monthly visits not verifiedProvider-domain visits measure interest in a company, not the reach of its ad inventory.
Company / product historyLaunch and founding dates not independently verifiedCompany age, product launch and rebranding dates must be distinguished. See official resources below.Launch and founding dates not independently verifiedCompany age, product launch and rebranding dates must be distinguished. See official resources below.
Public reviews / forum scoreNo comparable publisher-only score verifiedCompany review pages may mix publishers, advertisers and ad viewers. Individual forum posts are not a representative rating.No comparable publisher-only score verifiedCompany review pages may mix publishers, advertisers and ad viewers. Individual forum posts are not a representative rating.

YOUR SHORTLIST

Choose the next conversation

Consider ironSource Exchange (iSX) if…

App publishers confirming continued iSX programmatic demand and supported onboarding with Unity.

Before committing: ironSource direct demand ended April 30, 2026; iSX remains distinct from LevelPlay mediation.

Consider Moloco SDK if…

App developers adding Moloco publisher demand to a supported mediation stack.

Before committing: This comparison covers Moloco’s publisher SDK, not its advertiser campaigns or retail media products.

Questions before you switch

Which is better for me: ironSource Exchange (iSX) or Moloco SDK?

ironSource Exchange (iSX): App publishers confirming continued iSX programmatic demand and supported onboarding with Unity. Moloco SDK: App developers adding Moloco publisher demand to a supported mediation stack. Start with eligibility and product role, then compare net results on matched inventory. There is no universal winner in this comparison.

Is ironSource Exchange (iSX) easier to get approved for than Moloco SDK?

The catalog estimates setup effort as high for ironSource Exchange (iSX) and medium for Moloco SDK. Those estimates combine review and integration work. Neither a measured acceptance-rate comparison nor a guaranteed approval time is available; your content, traffic, region and account status matter.

Will ironSource Exchange (iSX) pay more than Moloco SDK?

We have not verified a controlled revenue benchmark for this pair. Compare net ad ARPDAU and eCPM for the same OS, country, format and user cohort; include fill, latency and retention. Obtain the actual fees and payment terms before testing.

Can I use ironSource Exchange (iSX) and Moloco SDK together?

Possibly, if their current mediation adapters, bidding integrations and agreements support it. A mediator and an ad network can be complementary, but two mediation layers are not automatically compatible. Confirm the exact SDK versions, account requirements, consent forwarding and reporting path with both providers.

Sources & evidence limits

Platform requirements, formats and payment summaries reuse the existing catalog, compiled 2026-11-03. They may require account-specific confirmation. The editorial comparisons do not represent newly verified platform policies. External company-review links are research starting points; no rating or traffic snapshot has been imported from them.

Revenue rankings, review / forum averages, current company-history dates, active-user counts and comparable provider-domain visits have not been independently verified for this pair. Unavailable means unknown, not zero or poor performance. Read the full method.

Build your comparisonApp platforms only

All app ads comparisons